Analysis of Academic Program Review from U.S. Higher Education Institutions: Implementation and Implications for Vietnamese HEIs

Các tác giả

  • Nhung Tuyet Thi Pham
  • Thuy Hoang Ho Nguyen
  • Valerie Osland Paton

Tóm tắt

Assessing the effectiveness and quality of academic programs in higher education is a fundamental task to ensure the long-term viability of a university. This responsibility falls primarily on administrative bodies such as the Ministry of Education and Training and higher education accreditation agencies. This qualitative study examines the handbooks for academic program review from ten US universities, representing various institutional types. These include three research universities (two public and one private not-for-profit), three master's universities (two public and one private not-for-profit), and four bachelor's universities (two public and two private not-for-profit), as classified by the Carnegie Classification system. The thematic analysis of these handbooks reveals three key components: Comprehensive process and procedure, resources to support the implementation of academic program review, and peer evaluation. Recommendations are proposed for Vietnamese higher education institutions to adapt and integrate these practices effectively, thereby enhancing the internal quality assurance of academic programs.

Tài liệu tham khảo

ACCJC (2024). Accreditation standards. https://accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/ACCJC-2024-Accreditation-Standards.pdf

Colorado College (2024). Academic Program Review. https://www.coloradocollege.edu/offices/dean-faculty/chairs-program-directors/general-departmental-duties/departmental-external-reviews.html

Dalton State College (2024). Academic Program Review. https://www.daltonstate.edu/about/institutional-research/comprehensive-program-review

HLC (2021). Criteria for accreditation. https://www.hlcommission.org/Policies/criteria-and-core-components.html

Ministry of Education and Training (2020). Circular No. 12/2020/TT-BGDĐT dated May 22, 2020, provides guidance on the functions, tasks, and powers of the Department of Education and Training under the Provincial People’s Committee, directly under the Central Government, the Education and Training Office under the District People’s Committee, district, town, city under the province, and city under the Central Government.

Ministry of Education and Training (2021). Circular No. 17/TT-BGDĐT dated May 19, 2021 regulates the standards of training programs; development, appraisal, and issuance of training programs for different levels of higher education.

Missouri Department of Higher Education (2024). Academic Review. https://dhewd.mo.gov/cota/ExistingAcademicProgramReview.php

MOET (2016). Vietnam Qualification Framework. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-1982-QD-TTg-phe-duyet-khung-trinh-do-quoc-gia-Viet-Nam-2016-327841.aspx

MSCHE (2015). Standards for accreditation and requirements of affiliation, Middle states commission on higher education. https://www.msche.org/standards/thirteenth-edition/

NECHE (2021). The standards for accreditation. https://www.neche.org/standards-for-accreditation/

NWCCU (2023). NWCCU Accreditation Handbook. https://nwccu.org/accreditation-handbook/

Pham, T. T. N. (2019). Factors influencing internal quality assurance activities in Vietnam. In H. C. Nguyen, & M. Shah (Eds.), Internal quality assurance in Vietnamese higher education: Policies and Practices in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

SACSCOC (2024). Principles of Accreditation: Foundation for Quality Enhancement. https://sacscoc.org/accrediting-standards/

Texas A&M (2024). Academic Program Review. https://aa.tamu.edu/Resources/Academic-Program-Review#nttwps0ta210

Texas Higher Education Department (THED) (2018). Annual Progress Reports & Graduate Program Review. https://reportcenter.highered.texas.gov/training-materials/presentations/annual-progress-reports-graduate-program-review/

University of Dallas (2024). Program Review. https://graduate.utdallas.edu/faculty/program_review/

University of Illinois (2024). Academic Program review. https://provost.illinois.edu/assessment/academic-program-review/

University of Madison (2024). Academic Program review. https://provost.illinois.edu/assessment/academic-program-review/the-review-process/

Lượt tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

2024-06-28

Cách trích dẫn

Analysis of Academic Program Review from U.S. Higher Education Institutions: Implementation and Implications for Vietnamese HEIs. (2024). Journal of Contemporary Educational Policies and Practices, 8(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2024.384

Số

Chuyên mục

Original Articles

Cách trích dẫn

Analysis of Academic Program Review from U.S. Higher Education Institutions: Implementation and Implications for Vietnamese HEIs. (2024). Journal of Contemporary Educational Policies and Practices, 8(2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2024.384

Các bài báo tương tự

1-10 trên 162

Bạn cũng có thể bắt đầu một tìm kiếm tương tự nâng cao cho bài báo này.

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả