Utilizing summative test for improving the quality of teaching and learning - a direction of applying formative assessment in high school

Authors

  • Duy Duc Phan
  • Yen Thi Hai Nguyen

Abstract

Formative assessment plays a crucial role in improving the quality of teaching and learning process. However, this activity has superficially concerned in Vietnam whilst summative assessment (specifically the summative tests) has experienced a long dominant period for assessing student’s academic achievement. This paper highlights the outstanding issues of formative assessment practice in real context teaching. In addition, we present some implementation measures to use summative tests for improving teaching and learning quality in high school. Proposed examples in this article are illustrated in Biology teaching.

References

Baartman, L. K. et al. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(2), 153-170.

Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science education, 85(5), 536-553.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102

Dao, H. M. et al. (2013). The Study of Application of the Assessment Techniques in Classrooms for Secondary Education in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science, Educational Research, 29(2), 10‐23.

Gioka, O. (2007). Assessment for learning in biology lessons. Journal of biological education, 41(3), 113-116.

Granbom, M. (2016). Formative Assessment and Increased Student Involvement Increase Grades in an Upper Secondary School Biology Course. Journal of biological education, 2, 185-195.

Hayden, M. & Le, T. N. L. (2013). Vietnam: the education system - a need to improve quality. In LP Symaco (ed.), Education in south-east Asia, Bloomsbury Academic, London, 260-277.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144.

Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1996). Meanings and consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537-548.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Utilizing summative test for improving the quality of teaching and learning - a direction of applying formative assessment in high school. (2019). Journal of Contemporary Educational Policies and Practices, 3(2), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2019.43

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Utilizing summative test for improving the quality of teaching and learning - a direction of applying formative assessment in high school. (2019). Journal of Contemporary Educational Policies and Practices, 3(2), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2019.43

Similar Articles

111-120 of 174

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.